COVID - a disease - is supposedly caused by a virus. However, SARS COV2, the purported virus was never isolated. China couldn’t do it. The CDC (The Center for Disease Commercialization) in March of 2020 approved 59 different PCR tests, which shouldn’t be used as a diagnostic tool, as they weren’t sure what they were dealing with. FIFTY NINE! All with different sequencing. The whole thing is absurd.
However, many many doctors and individuals were seemingly helped by two substances - Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine. Both of these are not anti-virals, they’re anti-parasitics. They kill parasites.
Is it not reasonable to consider the possibility COVID was at least in part, and maybe in full, caused by a parasite? If someone has something wrong and you give them antibiotics and he or she gets better we feel safe in saying ‘this was caused by a bacterial infection’. Because it worked. A few anti-parasitics probably are working, if given in the right doses and given early enough. Why doesn’t ‘The Science’ and the Medical Industry (formerly known as ‘doctors’) consider all along whatever was going around was possibly caused by a parasite? Since treating someone with something that kills parasites seems to work.
Of course, then you’d have to think ‘where was this parasite, which one(s) is/are it/they, and how was it disseminated?’ One possible answer is to go back and consider where were the first really large outbreaks? Food processing plants! Remember? Early in 2020 there were major, major breakouts in food processing plants. The plants had to be shut down. What likely was the common denominator in these plants? Everyone would eat the same food. When you work in a food processing plant almost always you get a free ration of whatever is being made. It’s like getting a free meal when you work at a restaurant.
Consider how many food processing plants were destroyed in 2020. Why? One possibility, (and I admit this could be the novelist in me leaking out), is because the plants were all contaminated with the same parasite, and the evidence of this had to be destroyed.
To suggest it wasn’t disseminated seems unreasonable. Parasites don’t spread around. You get it, or you don’t. You can’t get it sitting beside someone on a bus. If it were spread around it would have to be done on purpose. What better way to spread an ugly parasite than to spread it through mega food plants. Plants that would have made food stuffs consumed by tens of millions of people.
Once it had been spread around, the fear was hyped, they didn’t have to continue to spread it. At that point everything could be called COVID - every cold, cough, bronchitis, flu, pneumonia, etc. - all COVID. And, they got their pandemic.
Of course, they won’t look at this, because ‘vaccines’ make way more money than do anti-parasiticals. And really, that’s what it’s all about, right? It isn’t about health, and hasn’t been for quite a long time. It is about selling big Pharma products.
IVERMECTIN IS INDEED AN ANTI-PARASITIC, While Hca is an antimalarial that also treats works to suppress systemic lupus.
This makes a lot of sense, "Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine. Both of these are not anti-virals, they’re anti-parasitics. They kill parasites.
Is it not reasonable to consider the possibility COVID was at least in part, and maybe in full, caused by a parasite?"
Anyone who has seen the strange objects in the mRNA gene therapies in microscopic videos is away of the presence of Graphine Oxide as well as what appears to by selfassymbling nanobots.
*Even though graphene oxide is made with the same atoms as our organs, tissues and cells, its bi-dimensional nature causes unique interactions with blood proteins and biological membranes and can lead to severe effects like thrombogenicity and immune cell activation.*
David E. Martin PhD is the developer of several innovation-based quantitative indices of public equities and founder of the Purple Bridge Funds and M-CAM International. He has worked closely with the United States Congress and numerous trade and financial regulatory agencies in the United States. Dr. Martin is also a Batten Fellow at the University of Virginia's Darden Graduate School of Business Administration.
Since 1999, Dr. Martin has been actively tracking patent applications and approvals for the purpose of identifying suspicious activity. In the 94-minute video shown below, he shares the findings from his research regarding the laboratory development of a pathogenic coronavirus that started in 1999 and released initially upon human populations in the SARS CoV-1 in 2002-2003, then again in MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome in 2012, and then again in SARS CoV-2 which was renamed COVID-19, as shown below with evidence from the primary development lab in Wuhan China.
In my opinion, his research proves that all of these pathogenic variants of the coronavirus were laboratory developed, man-made bioweapons. And they've all been funded by the NIAID under the direction of a self-proclaimed Jesuit, Dr. Anthony Fauci.