12 Comments
User's avatar
Nathanael's avatar

Great post. I have also come to this same conclusion.

Other ideas I have 'on the shelf' (whether exogenous or endogenous I'm not sure)

1. I wonder if possible to induce colds/flu via chemicals/heavy metals (arsenic for example - exogenous)

2. There is also the radiological component to consider - both exo and endo (technology/weather and our own thoughts feelings)

3. Bile dumps from the liver excreting toxins (endogenous)

Expand full comment
elizabeth nickson's avatar

Very neat analysis, as in precise, systematic, marked by elegant simplicity....

Expand full comment
Mystic William's avatar

Thank you. Have you read about Terrain? It led me down the rabbit hole of viruses. It is very hokey ‘science’. NO VIRUS HAS EVER BEEN ISOLATED!! Not measles, mumps, HIV, anything. I had no idea of that. 100+ years of studying them and we haven’t found one? It is more reasonable to believe they don’t exist than to believe they do exist.

Expand full comment
elizabeth nickson's avatar

Judy Mikovits thinks they are all a product of the HIV and or Leukemia genome that was in every vaccine, so that "viruses' was the term they invented to explain away vaccine injury. When she found the leukemia in a vaccine, they tried to jail her without charge and destroyed her career and her family's finances.

Expand full comment
Evil Harry's avatar

Nicely put, but I still can't reconcile that explantion with small outbreaks of chickenpox, or the common cold.

Back in the military, we did a few weeks turn around at a secure base.

If one of the outgoing troops had a cold / flu, then it would usually spread like wildfire through the incoming troops, despite only brief crossover of minutes.

The arguments about it being EMF or the body clearing itself of toxins always failed for me, because if that was the case, why would we all appear to get the same illness.

Your well written explanation covers that, but it still seems bizarre that the cleaning operation can in fact kill you quite easily.

Expand full comment
Mystic William's avatar

The idea things spread seems to be our experience. But maybe it isn’t true. It has to do with numbers. If you take a 10,000 square board, 100 x 100, and you take 5,000 black blots and 5,000 white and shake them up and place them randomly they won’t go black white black white etc. There will be clumps of whites, areas of blacks. Ten whites in a row, five blacks, 2 whites, 9 blacks, and so on. When a clump occurs everyone thinks it passed around. To really do this properly we would have to poll 10,000 people for at least three years. How often does one nearly come down with something. How often fully come down. How often did others get it. How often one person got sick. Etc.

Expand full comment
Mystic William's avatar

The cleansing doesn’t. One’s immune system isn’t capable of cleaning itself. When an elderly person is ready to go, they stop eating, they stop responding, and then a slight cough or cold kills them. But it isn’t the cold. It is the body failing to respond properly. ....maybe....

Expand full comment
Mystic William's avatar

Last...we call many many diseases ‘viruses’. I have known friends to get herpes from someone. And then give it to someone. However, and chickenpox might be the same, it might be an infectious parasite. The skin transmission diseases might be transmissible but they might be a parasite. Parasites are transmissible. They exist.

Expand full comment
Mystic William's avatar

AIDS has a very simple explanation that doesn’t need a virus. (Which has never been found. Only theorized.).

Expand full comment
Diana's avatar

I really liked your analysis reconciling terrain theory with absence of virus theory. It's amazing how it fits the data and explains so many anomalies. Now, using your same analytical powers, how can we test this hypothesis? Don't overwork yourself preparing a grant proposal--for the government and big pharma will never allow a large study that could gain media attention to be funded. And any smaller studies will be immediately dismissed as inconclusive. And no reputable medical journal (all captured) will publish your results. They will have to be published, instead, in some obscure publication such as Journal for the Study of Particles in Nature and Humans.

Expand full comment
Mystic William's avatar

Thanks. I am thinking of it actually. It is an idea only at this point. But, off the top of my head one would have to uncover the chemical or type of chemical the body produces when it sneezes/coughs/sweats etc. That should be doable. Then analyze a sneeze or a cough and see if the same chemical is present in anything expelled. Next, isolate that chemical and spray it on animals and see if they sneeze. If they do, then it would be more than an idea, and become an actual theory.

Expand full comment
Hudson E Baldwin lll's avatar

A diatribe of mental oatmeal what about ism

Expand full comment